Animal rights is the concept that all or some animals are entitled to possess their own lives, and that animals are deserving of moral rights to protect their autonomy and well being. The animal rights view rejects the concept that animals are merely capital goods or property intended for the benefit of humans. (46) The concept is often confused with animal welfare, which is the philosophy that takes cruelty towards animals and animal suffering into account, but that does not necessarily assign specific moral rights to them.
The animal rights philosophy does not necessarily maintain that human and non-human animals are equal. For example, animal rights advocates do not call for voting rights for chickens. (47) Some also would make a distinction between sentient or self-aware animals and lower life forms, with the belief that only animals with self-awareness should be afforded the right to possess their own lives and bodies, without regard to how they are valued by humans. Others would extend this right to all animals, even those without developed nervous systems or consciousness. (48) They maintain that any human or human institutions that commoditizes animals for food, entertainment, clothing, scientific testing, or for any other purpose, infringes upon their fundamental rights to possess themselves and to pursue their own ends, which, therefore, is unethical.
Of course, this argument assumes that a particular species or individual animal is capable of “having ends” which it is capable of “pursuing” in any meaningful manner. Few people would deny that other great apes are highly cognitive animals who can reflect on their own condition and goals and can become frustrated when their freedoms are severely curtailed. In contrast, many other animals, like jelly fish, have only extremely simple nervous systems, and are little more than simple automata, capable only of simple reflexes but incapable of formulating any “ends to their actions” or “plans to pursue” them, and equally unable to notice whether they are in captivity or free. (49) By the criteria that Biologists use, jelly fish are undeniably animals, while from an “animal rights” perspective, it is questionable whether they should not rather be considered “vegetables”. Clearly, merely being alive is not enough to be accorded “rights”, as no one has yet seriously proposed that plants should be accorded rights (even though some plants are clearly worthy of protection, but that is another matter). (50) There is as yet no consensus with regards to which qualities make a living organism an “animal in the animal rights sense”.
參考譯文:
46. 動(dòng)物權(quán)利的概念經(jīng)常與動(dòng)物福利相混淆,關(guān)于動(dòng)物福利的觀點(diǎn)會(huì)考慮殘害動(dòng)物和動(dòng)物痛苦等問(wèn)題,但它不一定賦予動(dòng)物具體的道德權(quán)利。
47. 有些人還在有知覺(jué)力或者有自我意識(shí)的動(dòng)物與更為低級(jí)的生命形式之間劃清界線,相信只有具有自我意識(shí)的動(dòng)物才能享有擁有自己生命和身體的權(quán)利,而不用考慮人類(lèi)如何對(duì)待它們。
48. 他們堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為,任何把動(dòng)物商品化的個(gè)人或者機(jī)構(gòu),如把動(dòng)物用于食物、娛樂(lè)、服飾、科學(xué)試驗(yàn)或者其他任何目的,都是對(duì)擁有自己、追求自己的目標(biāo)等動(dòng)物基本權(quán)利的侵犯,因此是不道德的。
49. 按照生物學(xué)家使用的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),海蜇毫無(wú)疑問(wèn)屬于動(dòng)物之列,而從“動(dòng)物權(quán)利”角度來(lái)看,是否不該把它們看作“蔬菜”是值得懷疑的。
50. 關(guān)于哪些品質(zhì)使一種活的生命成為“動(dòng)物權(quán)利意義上的動(dòng)物”,到現(xiàn)在(至今)還沒(méi)有達(dá)成一致意見(jiàn)。
(46) A hundred years ago, when sport was confined largely to games played in the backyard or on the farm, one could hardly have imagined the attention that it has come to receive in the twentieth century. Today, the importance of sport in society is clearly demonstrated by the fact that even the CBS news can be preempted for the final of a tennis match. A survey conducted in the late 1980s revealed that fully 81 percent of all adults follow some organized sport, mostly on television. And the phenomenon of weekend “sports widows”—women abandoned by their husbands for weekend sports on television—is entering its third generation.
Sport is defined sociologically as competitive physical activity that is performed under established rules. Like all social institutions, sport serves numerous functions. First, it provides society with a vast array of leisure-time activities for all segments of the population. (47) Although it is an overstatement to say that modern society is a leisure society, there has been a significant increase in the amount of nonwork time that most people have available. Furthermore, recreational activity has become increasingly necessary in a society in which the vast majority of jobs provide little or no physical activity. Second, sport provides an outlet for energies that, if not diverted, could cause serious strain on the social order. (48) For both fan and participant, sport permits the expression of emotions (such as anger and frustration) in ways that are acceptable to, even encouraged by, society. Finally, sport provides society with role models. Athletes at all levels, but especially famous athletes, provide examples of conduct and employment of skills that others can emulate.
Although sports promote many positive aspects of a society, conflict theorists are quick to point out that they also reflect society’s inequalities. Like most other social institutions, sports are characterized by inequalities of class, race and gender. For example, certain sports—such as boxing, which is often associated with urban poverty—are distinctly lower class in origin and participation. (49) In general, members of the lower and working classes have tended to participate in sports like baseball and basketball: games that require little more than a field, a ball, and some players.
Although sport is sometimes considered exempt from racial inequality, sociological evidence has shown this not to be the case. (50) Although it is true that nonwhites in American society have enjoyed greater opportunities for high incomes in professional sports than in other occupations, it is also true that virtually all managers and owners of sports team are white. There are few nonwhite sportscasters, administrators, umpires, or referees. Furthermore, nonwhites are all but absent (even as players) from all professional sports except baseball, basketball, boxing and football.
參考譯文:
46. 100年前,運(yùn)動(dòng)僅僅限于那些在后院或者農(nóng)場(chǎng)中舉行的活動(dòng),那時(shí)恐怕沒(méi)有人會(huì)想到它在20世紀(jì)的今天所受到的關(guān)注程度。
47. 雖然說(shuō)現(xiàn)代社會(huì)是一個(gè)休閑社會(huì)有些言過(guò)其實(shí),但是大多數(shù)人的確比以前擁有了更多的非工作時(shí)間。
48. 無(wú)論是運(yùn)動(dòng)迷還是參與者,運(yùn)動(dòng)都能使他們以社會(huì)能接受或者鼓勵(lì)的方式表達(dá)他們的感情(如憤怒和挫折感)。
49. 一般來(lái)說(shuō),下層勞動(dòng)人民傾向于參與棒球和籃球這樣的運(yùn)動(dòng),因?yàn)檫@類(lèi)運(yùn)動(dòng)只需要一塊場(chǎng)地、一個(gè)球和幾名球員就足夠了。
50. 雖然和美國(guó)社會(huì)的其他職業(yè)相比,職業(yè)運(yùn)動(dòng)中有色人種獲取高收入的機(jī)會(huì)大一些,但是幾乎所有運(yùn)動(dòng)隊(duì)的經(jīng)理和老板都是白人。
特別聲明:①凡本網(wǎng)注明稿件來(lái)源為"原創(chuàng)"的,轉(zhuǎn)載必須注明"稿件來(lái)源:育路網(wǎng)",違者將依法追究責(zé)任;
②部分稿件來(lái)源于網(wǎng)絡(luò),如有侵權(quán),請(qǐng)聯(lián)系我們溝通解決。
25人覺(jué)得有用
30
2009.05
Text 5 Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing efficiency in th......
30
2009.05
Text 1 China has been through a wrenching series of changes and experiments. (1) It is n......
30
2009.05
2009年研究生入學(xué)考試即將打響,本人發(fā)現(xiàn)很多同學(xué)在準(zhǔn)備考研作文時(shí)有兩個(gè)誤區(qū): 一、認(rèn)為作文不可能短......
30
2009.05
考研作文在考研英語(yǔ)考試中占據(jù)了30分的比例,是不容忽視的重要部分。根據(jù)《考研大綱》對(duì)作文這一部......
30
2009.05
從歷年的考試來(lái)看,翻譯題是考研英語(yǔ)各題型中得分率較低的,因此如何把握整個(gè)翻譯過(guò)程就顯得尤為重要......
30
2009.05
考研英語(yǔ)翻譯的難度不斷上升,從2009年全國(guó)碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試中的翻譯試題上就可以看出,而且這......