Summarize the information " />
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
|
The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. ![]() 該圖表從三個不同方面展示了六個城市地鐵系統(tǒng)的特點。 The table demonstrates the features of the underground railway systems in 6 cities in three different aspects. 首先,這六個城市的地鐵系統(tǒng)是按年代順序開通的,其中倫敦是最早的(1863年),而洛杉磯是最晚的(2001年)。地鐵系統(tǒng)在20世紀(jì)進(jìn)入全盛時期,四條地鐵線路分別在巴黎(1900年),東京(1927年),華盛頓(1976年),以及洛杉磯(1981年)建立起來。 First, the subway systems in the six cities were opened in time sequence with London being the earliest (in 1863) and Los Angeles the latest ( in 2001 ). The underground railway system had their prime time in the 20th century, which saw the construction of 4 underground railway systems respectively in Paris (1900), in Tokyo (1927), in Washington DC (1976), and in Los Angeles (1981). 第二,依照從倫敦到洛杉嘰的排列順序,也是根據(jù)建造地鐵的年代順序,這六個城市地鐵線路長度基本上依次大幅降低。倫敦線路最長,394公里,巴黎第二,199公里,東京第三,155公里,華盛頓126公里。京都和洛杉嘰最有趣,分別只有區(qū)區(qū)11公里和28公里,難與前四名相提并論。 Second, seen from London to Los Angeles, which happened to be in chronological order of subway construction, the above-mentioned six cities roughly revealed a trend of sharp decrease in the length of the subway route. London ranked No. 1 in this respect, with a length of 394km; Paris came next with 199km; Tokyo was No. 3 with 155km; Washington DC ranked No. 4 with 126 km. Kyoto and Los Angeles were the most interesting, with merely 11km and 28km respectively, nothing comparable with the top 4 cities. 第三,在這六個城市每年地鐵運送乘客的數(shù)量上我們看到一些令人難以預(yù)料的數(shù)據(jù)。東京成為領(lǐng)頭羊,有19億2千7百萬之多;巴黎名列第二,有11億9千1百萬;倫敦位居第三,為7億7千5百萬;華盛頓第四,1億4千4百萬;洛杉嘰和京都分別是5千萬和4千5百萬。因此,與其它城市相比可見差距之大。 Third, we see some really unexpected figures about the number of passengers transported by the subway system in these six cities. Tokyo took the lead with 1.927 billion; Paris came next with 1.191 billion; London was No. 3 with 775 million; Washington DC was No. 4 with 144 million. Los Angeles and Kyoto had 50 million and 45 million respectively. Therefore, we can see the big difference as compared with other cities. 總之,6個城市在地鐵的建設(shè)歷史、地鐵長度和年運送旅客能力方面皆呈現(xiàn)出了很大的不同。 Overall, the six cities revealed great differences in the history of subway construction, the length of subway lines and the yearly passenger transportation capability. |
雅思考試論壇熱貼: |
【責(zé)任編輯:蘇婧 糾錯】 |
|
閱讀上一篇:雅思A類作文中圖畫題的講解:原因說明 |
|
閱讀下一篇:烤鴨必讀:2008年夏季雅思寫作總結(jié) |
|
【育路網(wǎng)版權(quán)與免責(zé)聲明】 | |
① 凡本網(wǎng)注明稿件來源為"原創(chuàng)"的所有文字、圖片和音視頻稿件,版權(quán)均屬本網(wǎng)所有。任何媒體、網(wǎng)站或個人轉(zhuǎn)載、鏈接、轉(zhuǎn)貼或以其他方式復(fù)制發(fā)表時必須注明"稿件來源:育路網(wǎng)",違者本網(wǎng)將依法追究責(zé)任; | |
② 本網(wǎng)部分稿件來源于網(wǎng)絡(luò),任何單位或個人認(rèn)為育路網(wǎng)發(fā)布的內(nèi)容可能涉嫌侵犯其合法權(quán)益,應(yīng)該及時向育路網(wǎng)書面反饋,并提供身份證明、權(quán)屬證明及詳細(xì)侵權(quán)情況證明,育路網(wǎng)在收到上述法律文件后,將會盡快移除被控侵權(quán)內(nèi)容。 |
視頻課程 |
·雅思聽力考試的最大障礙:詞匯聽不懂 |
·從劍橋聽力看出題難點 |
·堅持不懈訓(xùn)練雅思聽力方法 |
·雅思聽力備考關(guān)鍵:最后一堂課的“份量” |
·名師解析雅思聽力兩大誤區(qū) |
·聽力考試中的數(shù)字考點 |
·10月24日雅思聽力考題回顧 |
·烤鴨必備 走近雅思聽力 |
·為什么聽力總是第二遍才能聽懂 |
·烤鴨,帶你走近雅思聽力! |